PDA

View Full Version : Ruger LCR



Cris
05-04-2009, 08:11 AM
Saw these at the shot show and was not too impressed with them, I thought maybe the Crimson Trace grip might help it out. I was wrong. It still feels cheesy. I can see recalls coming from these in the near future for being pretty much all polymer. Hell it still weighs more than the S&W 340PD and that is made out of metal. Plus this firearm is .38 only not .357 like Smith & Wesson.



The Ruger® LCR™ (Lightweight Compact Revolver) represents one of the most significant new revolver designs in over a century. This small-framed, lightweight revolver consists of three main components: a polymer fire control housing, an aircraft quality aluminum monolithic frame, and an extensively fluted stainless steel cylinder. Each of these components give the LCR a unique advantage over traditional revolvers.

The lightweight, chemical-resistant polymer fire control housing contains the entire fire control mechanism, providing a tighter dimensional relationship of the components than if divided between a traditional grip frame and cylinder frame. The end result is that the fire control components are assembled with no hand fitting, resulting in a highly consistent product at an affordable price.

The LCR's standard Hogue® Tamer™ grip helps reduce perceived recoil. If another grip is more your style, the convenient grip peg allows for a variety of grips to be installed.

The LCR's monolithic frame is an aerospace grade, 7000 series aluminum forging treated with a black synergistic hard coat that offers performance considerably greater than hard coat anodizing. This provides a sturdy, rigid support for the stainless steel cylinder and barrel.

The cylinder is extensively fluted to be lightweight and compact, measuring only 1.283" in diameter in the chamber area. It is treated with an advanced form of Ruger's Target Grey® finish and is durable enough to handle .38 Special +P loads. The cylinder front latching system uses titanium components, optimized spring tension, and enhanced lockup geometry to ensure that the LCR's cylinder stays locked in place during firing.

The LCR's double-action trigger pull is uniquely engineered to minimize friction between the fire control components, resulting in a non-stacking, smooth trigger pull. The trigger force builds more gradually, and peaks later in the trigger stroke, resulting in a trigger pull that feels much lighter than it actually is. This results in more comfortable shooting, even among those with smaller, weaker hands.

The evolution of the revolver has arrived in the Ruger LCR.

LCR™
http://www.ruger.com/Firearms/images/Product-Variations/454.jpg (http://www.ruger.com/Firearms/FAProdResults?function=famid&famid=65&variation=LCR%E2%84%A2&bct=Yes&type=Revolver)

A 13.5 ounce, small-framed revolver with a polymer fire control housing, an aircraft quality aluminum monolithic frame with synergistic hard coat, an extensively fluted stainless steel cylinder, and a uniquely engineered double-action trigger.

ss1
05-04-2009, 10:24 AM
Like you, I was not overly impressed with it at the SHOT Show, as I was expecting something extremey light and small. One of the things about the S&W 340PD that is pretty much consistent from everyone that's shot one is that shooting .357 out of it is rather unpleasant. I suppose that frame and cylinder materials could have been designed to handle the pressures of .357 but we are not talking about a $900 revolver. I suppose Ruger could make a titanium cylinder version down the road that could be even lighter, but watch that price escalate. As I was checking out the gun at the shop last week, Rich and I compared the weight to a PD. Pretty comparable - about an ounce heavier but still, over $200 cheaper even with the laser grip. What I didn't see are steel inserts to protect the aluminum frame from the blast coming out between the cylinder and forcing cone. Both the Taurus magnesium frame revolver and the S&W alloy frames have them. Granted, I didn't have my specs on, so they could be there and machined so well that I just didn't see them. Anyhoo, in all fairness, if you use the S&W 340PD as the benchmark for concealed carry revolvers, you are not going to find too many ooo's and aaah's with any of it's competitors. I've read that the steel parts has some pretty remarkable corrosion resistance making this gun a good option for the tackle box.

JaxChris
05-04-2009, 12:51 PM
You guys just get back from the SHOT show? Wasn't it in Feb? Or just getting around to a second impression now and still disappointed?

ss1
05-04-2009, 01:41 PM
You guys just get back from the SHOT show? Wasn't it in Feb? Or just getting around to a second impression now and still disappointed?

Yes the SHOT Show was back in Feb. I think the timing of this opinion piece is more due to the fact that we got one in the shop. I don't think I'm as disappointed, as my initial reaction. Maybe I didn't make it clear, but I think I can justify their decisions on weight and caliber for the price point that they chose. I may not want one because of those choices, but I don't think it was a half-assed execution like some other guns on the market.

Cris
05-04-2009, 06:11 PM
Yeah we got one in the shop and was hoping it may have changed since I first saw it at the shot show, I was wrong. It still feels and looks like shit.